Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

12 articles on this Page

-----------'--"---.-.-.-REVISION…

News
Cite
Share

REVISION COURTS. NEWTOWN. 'On Tuesday, Mr Elphinstone Lloyd mt, at 'the Police Court, Newtown, to revise the lists for Aberhafesp, Bettws, Kerry, Llanllwchaiarn, Llanmerewig, Llanwnog, Mochdre, Newtown, Penstrowed, and Tregynon parishes. Mr Ed- ward Evans, Secretary of the Montgomeryshire Conservative and Unionist Association, ap- peared for the Conservatives, along with him being Mr Alfred Parry, assistant secretary For the Liberals, Mr J. T. C. Gittins appeared for the County, and Mr W. Lewis for the Bor- oughs. OVERSEER AND HIS EXCUSE LIST. Dealing with the Asberhafesp lists, David Thoma-s Vvilcock, Hafren, and Sarah Morris, lodge keeper, employed by Lord Joicey, were struck off on Conservative objections. Sarah Watkin was claimed for by the Liber- als, but Mr Gittins remarked that she had not paid her rates. It transpired she had not done for some years, and the Assistant Overseer said he had placed her upon the excuse list." Her rates had been excused in previous years, and perhaps it prevented her costing the parish Hiore. Mr Evans enquired if she had applied to be put on the excuse list. The Assistant Overseer admitted she had Qot, but sa.id he prepared the list. Eventually the vote was allowed. BETTWS. Mr William Griffiths, assistant overseer for this parish, said there, was one claim, and this Mr Evans said was his. It was successive, the claimant having been co-occupier with his bro- thers at Tycoch, 'Llanwyddelan, and was now sole tenant of Llwvncoch.—The vote was al- lowed. Mr Evans claimed a County Council vote for Mr Swettenham, of Tregynon, who occupies a 'garden in Bettws parish. He said the garden ,^as about 15s. a year, but on it the claimant had put up a permanent building with the con- sent of fthe landlord. That had value in addi- tion to the :la»E, Ihe submitted he was en- titled to be on Division 3. Mr Gittins said his information was that it Was only a temporary shed, and had been put -113 since the 15th July. Mr A. D. Jones, assistant overseer of Tre- was called, and said the garden was held from Lord Joicey, and the shed had been IIp nearly two years. It was a permanent structure, and without it the garden would be °f little use, as it was some distance from claim- us ant's house. It was used for storing imple- ments. 0 The Revising Barrister It is an easy way of getting a vote, but still he is entitled.—Vote al- lowed. TENEMENT OR BUILDING. *he Assistant Overseer had altered the de- scription of the qualifying property in one in- stance from land and tenement" to land 1I.nd building," and explained that the tenement ^&s in another parish. These were farm build- Ings. -The Revising Barrister: Well, why change • A building is a tenement. If it had been a u*e, the proper description would have been filing house! KERRY. wMr J. M. Milnes presented the lists for parish. There was one lodger claim, "ich Mr Gittins supported. The claimant a>9 Humphrey Davies, and Mr Howells, who £ "ln^nt oec,1Pier °f Gilfach, a farm rented at a year, said Davies lived with him, occu- lt,1,!1? a bedroom which he had furnished him- ■■■ He worked on the farm and was kept in leu of wages. The value would be 14s. or 16s. week. Cross-examined by Mr Evans Claimant was ardly an ordinary workman. His uncle had paid rates for many years. ~*r Evans Is he your uncle T Mr Howell: Yes. -M.r Evans I was not aware he w as a rela- I won't press the objection further, he vote was allowed. A SARN TENANCY: A QUESTION OF PROOF. ihe Conservatives claimed for William Alfred • a joint tenant with his father of Rhyd Mr Evans in support of the claim 1907111 ren^ an<^ ra*e reeeipt8 f°r 25th March, He added that this son followed another in tlie joint tenancy more than 12 months .Mr Gittins objected that tlie receipts didn't teT€r fuU period, and the Revising Barris- r said in joint tenancies he liked to have I ro°f. jn yie 0f it, the vote was dis- allowed. ^Mr Evans claimed a lodger vote for Mr J. M. Wen, assistant schoolmaster, which was al- lowed. THE LIBERAL AGENT GETS WROTH. kt. the request of Mr Evans, the Revising x arrister took two claims for Parliamentary tfs at Mochdre. In the first William Bowen ^yned a vote for joint tenancy of Tynyrhiew \r his brother, and put in the rate receipts. r Gittins asked for the rent receipts and when Ilf' hook was put. in declared that there were ,our 0f them for it, and that the claimant was Il't occupant with his mother and brothers, "ft -rent receipt was all in one and read— »tt«eeived of Mrs Bowen, Dugwm, and Messrs ^p'Ward and Willie Bowen, Tynyrhiew, the ^u«i of-—— This, Mr Gittins contended, was tenancy for the lot. lftiniant denied this, and declared he occu- pied Tynyrhiew with his brother separately. ,e admitted that the stock of his mother and brother was not separate, but she had no- to do with the holding. I ■lhe Revising Barrister said that was not e i,.e a he read the receipt. It was a receipt to rp's Bowen for Dugwm, and the others for rjJnyrhiew. It could not mean anything else. <-i ? objection fails. I believe it is a good Vi!Urn, hoin a,- u/^homas Bowen stepped forward now, where- tiia Gittins exclaimed "It's a regular J?l'factory of votes this place." Evans: I think you can let the Revising fji^'ister say that when he has heard the case, not for you to say it. man*' said he was tenant of Pentref, and dueed his rent book. 'tin j ^ev^s'no Barrister Is this the same let- ^'ahnant: No, a different landlord. S-exaxnined: He had occupied it 18 rjt*hs, and the value was £6 10s. vi^ Revising Barrister: That's not enough. r Evans But the objection is to the ten- rjT; .n°t-1° the value. He can't go into that. self manfc further said he had the land him- f'av ,ai,d had some sheep there. He would not ha 1 i°w niany> hut some were his own. He lion at Berriew, but was not away from to three weeks at a time. He was not tker« V^3t about his sheep. get I think vou are, when vou try to ^°ther vote in this voting joint stock com- hT'lle Revising Barrister said if anyone else Wa stock on the land with his permission it pi °.ee»pation. How much land was there? r.aiaiant: Sixty-four acres. 'Jajl Revising Barrister said the objection tlnf V but claimant was not entitled really. IYt'Ot°l'tunately lie was not objected to on the Tu °'' valu<3, and the vote would remain. MrTt?T MINISTER'S CLAIM ALLOWED. loc| R°wen, Baptist minister, was allowed a Iie 0r v°te in Mochdre parish. He stated that lie- pal. a bedroom and sitting room for op g- jle paid 6s. a week, in a house with five of f, e(ii'ooms, and where there was a family w (>i • Previously lie had paid 3s. 6d. a at another place. TheR THE BOROUGH LIST. the C-e lists were taken in the afternoon, when S\-aj 0nservatives were represented by Mr E. Bv \rw Mr Alfred Parry, and the Liberals wIliam L,ewis- Mr J- D- Rees< M-p-> I>Ur-r Hugh Lewis were also present. I'istoj. lnK 'he course of the revision, the Bar- Uld that he could not understand whj lito lists sliouid not have one ward and call them wards for the purposes of the District Council and divisions for the County Council. Mr Richard Goodwin (assistant overseer): They are not the same number with the Urban Council as they arc for the other. Thor-Ð is an extra ward, sir. The Barrister: But the Urban Council ha:7t' j County Council votes, have not they? Mr "Goodwin Yes, sir. The Barrister: But the County Council ooirt have an Urban Council vote? Mr Goodwin Not in that particular ward, sir. I THE VALUE OF BEDROOMS IN NEW- TOWN. Mr Lewis claimed lodger votes for David and John Henry Jarman in respect of bedrooms oc- cupied by them at Lower Gwostydd, in the Llanllwchaiarn ward. One of the claimants, Mr David Jarman, ap- peared and said that he and his' brother accu- pied separate rooms at Lower Gwestydd. Mr Evans How many bedrooms are there in the house?—Eleven. How many in family?—Eight. Without the servants?—Yes. The Barrister I only object to the value of the house. The rateable value of the house is Y,14 10s. This must be an enormous house. Mr Lewis It is, sir. The Applicant: We can put four beds in some of the rooms. Mr Evans: When the principle is admitted that the rateable value is not so much there is no claim. This house is assessed at Y,14 10s., and we accept that as a basis. The appli- cant wants us to believe that two of the rooms are worth Y-20, and the 11 would therefore be worth Cl20. Mr Lewis: This is a splendid house. It is an old hall. The Barrister: What price would you have to pay for a similar bedroom? Would he get a bedroom unfurnished for less than £10 a year in the locality? Mr Evans I don't think they would charge more than 5s. a week. (To claimant) You have a brother in addition to the two claim- ants?—Yes. Do you mean that three beds fire made up every day for the convenience of three bro- thers ? The Barrister And three different rooms ? Applicant: Yes, sir. Mr Lewis They employ workmen who live out in cottages. The Barrister Supposing that the whole of the bedrooms are worth this, what is there to prevent me putting on 13 lodgers? Mr Evans Nothing. I should say the other brother can claim next year if he is old enough. The Barrister: They might have 10 lodgers there. Mr Lewis: I had an aunt living there for many years, and she had the Vicar of Llan- llwchaiarn lodging there. He had two rooms for which he paid C2 a week, in the very same house. The Barrister He had the best bedroom. Mr Evans He had attendance as well. The Barrister The fact is the gross estimate is so very much below what you say is the worth of the house, the market value of such a house in the country must be low. Mr Lewis: The Assessment Committee are all farmers, and they put the value a»s low as they can. The Barrister eventually allowed the claim of David Jarman only. Mr Lewis objected to Thomas Owen Roberts, Llanfair road, being on the lodger's list be- cause the house was an old tollbar, and he maintained that there were not two rooms. The Barrister I cannot see that an old toll- house could have a bedroom and sitting room. —The claim was struck out. George Price applied for a vote as a lodger at Upper Gwestydd, and his uncle. Mr Price, The Pant, appeared to substantiate the claim. Mr Evans How many bedrooms are there in the house?—Six on the first floor, and there is an attic. How many children? Am I correct if I say there are eight children?—Yes. You say that this young man has the sole use of one bedroom, and the other members of the family occupy the others 1- Y ee. I maintain that the family is too large and there are too many in the family to have a vote.—Disallowed. Mr Evans claimed a lodger's vote for Wil- liam Latham in respect of rooms in a house in Union street. Mr Evans said that the son of this claimant is the tenant of the house, and was a professional footballer, and away from home for the greater part of the year. The claimant and his wife were the only occupants in the house. There were three bedrooms, and the rent was 98. Mr Lewis maintained that the claimant him- self paid nothing whatever. In fact half his time he slept out. He did not sleep in the house. Everybody knew that the husband did not live with his wife. The mother was the caretaker for her son, who was the tenant, and the claimant was a drunken man who slept out in buildings. He did not live with his wife half his time. Mr Evans You are speaking of the past. Mr Lewis I am speaking of the man as he is at present.—Disallowed. At a later period Mr Evans said that Mr Lewis made such accusations against Latham that he thought the wife should have an op- portunity of refuting them. Mrs Latham was called and sworn. She said she was the wife of the claimant, William Latham, and she and her husband had rooms in the house of her son. She paid 5s. 6d. a week either in cash or service for the two rooms in the house. The Barrister: I don't understand. I don't like these things re-opened. Cross-examined by Mr Lewis She was not there looking after the house for the son. She rented two rooms for her husband and herself. Her husband was at harvest and could not at- tend there. He had a respectable home to go to, and he did go to it. He did not sleep out. Mr Lewis' claim on behalf of David Chilton Francis for a lodger's vote at his mother's house in Chapel sreet, was opposed by Mr Evans. Claimant's mother appeared, and said that her son occupied the front bedroom. She had a son who was an invalid, but he was dovsbifitalvs. The .claimant had been out of work, but paid her 16s. a week. Mr Evans He is a plasterer's labourer. Mrs Francis He is a plasterer by trade. Mr Lewis And gets £ 2 or k2 10, a week. The claim was allowed. George William Hawkins claimed a lodger vote in respect of rooms in his father's house. Mr Lewis objected. The claimant said that five children and his father lived at the house, and there were four bedrooms upstairs and one down. He had the one upstairs. His was a large room. The Barrister: It seems there are most capacious bedrooms in Newtown. Do you mean that you have a better room than the one occupied by the other two?—I have not the best room. The Barriser If you haven't got it, I don't see that you have one worth £ 10 at all. Mr Evans, submitted that if Mr Hawkins was staying with a stranger he could not get that room under the amount stated in the claim. The Barrister: I certainly don't think that sounds like a good claim.-Struck out. The Local Government list was then gone through, and Mr Lewis claimed votes for sev- eral persons who occupied gtir(lens.-IAi- Ev-iils objected on the ground that the buildings on the gardens were removable and not permanent structures. They were the property of the ten- ant occupying the gardens. Where the build- ings were permanent structures he admitted the claims. Mr Lewis was proceeding to state his claim when the Barrister said that there was no evi- dence. His (Mr Lewis') statement was not evidence. Mr Lewis then called Ben Morgan, who hap- pened to be in Court, and stated that the gar- pened to be in Court, and stated that the gar- den occupied by John Edwards, Broad street, had a. building in it with a brick foundation. Mr Evans asked that the witness bo sworn, and this was done. Witness then gave similar evidence of the nature of the buildings on other gardens, and notwithstanding the production by Mr Evans of photos of the buildings, which appeared ro be small summer houses, the votes were al- lowed. Mr Evans, however, made successful objec- tions to several other claims., MONTGOMERY. Mr Lloyd sat at Montgomery on Wednesday to revise the lists for the parishes of Aston. Ber- riew, Castlewright, Churelistoke, Forden, Hys- sington, Llandysioil, Montgomery, and Snead. Mr J. T. C. Gittins, solicitor, Newtown, represent- ed the Liberals, and Mr E. Evans, Welshpool, the Conservatives. Mr J. D. Rees, M.P., was also present. In the Berriew lists Mr Gittins objected to the claim of George Foster, a gamekeeper, on the ground that the house in which he resided was a service occupation. Mr Evans said this was not so, as Foster could reside elsewhere if he wished. It also transpired that the claimant was gamekeeper to the lessee of the shooting and not to the owner of his dwelling house.—The claim was allowed. Mr Gittins succeeded in his objection to the vote of Thomas Griffiths, of Berriew Mill, who was transferred to Division 2 as a service voter. Mr Gittins also objected to the votes of four brothers named Bore who live at Courthouse Farm, Churelistoke, on the ground that it must be proved that they were actually partners and not sureties for the rent. This necessary evi- dence was forthcoming in a letter from the I agent of the Mellington estate, and the votes r were allowed. ) In the revision of the lists for the Borough of Montgomery, Mr W. Lewis, Newtown, repre- sented the Liberals, and Mr E. Evans the Con- servatives. The Conservatives objected to the vote of Mr J. Bevsn as owner of premises in Princes street. Mr Gittins said that part of a shop was let to a tenafrt., The Revising Barrier asked for proof of value of the portion let, but this was not forth- coming, and the name was struck out. The vote of Mr Maurice Owen, J.P., in re- spect of the ownership of land was similarly ob- jected to, and the objecion sustained. The Liberals objected to the votes of two of the freemen, Aaron Watkin and Edward Weaver on the ground of non-residence, and both names were struck off. +

MILITARY INFORMATION.

COUGHS, COLDS, AND CHRONIC…

!TOWYN.

[No title]

Advertising

LLANIDLOES COUNTY SESSIONS.

Advertising

-----------.".".,,-MACHYNLLETH…

ALLEGED PERJURY AT LLANIDLOES.

Advertising

DOLGELLEY.