Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

14 articles on this Page

HE TIQHBORKE TRIAL. I

News
Cite
Share

HE TIQHBORKE TRIAL. I imited space precludes us from giving aWl following condensed account.] fDRED AND SIXTY SIXtH DAY. a sitting of the Court on Monday morning, lealy said he wished to call their lordships' attention t improper paragraph ill the Western Mail, vyt.ich fitly inserted for the purpose of injuring the ci Sa- rd Chief Justice We will listen rith the greatest but let me first say that ou referring to pro- ihe other day at the poltc.-court, I find observations le upon the conduct of this Court which are per- ndalous. nealy I am not answerable for It, nor Is my client, 'd Chief .lustlca: Don't understand ma as in the iegree reflecting upon any one connected with the I am only adverting to it as a most insolent piece ity on the part of the gentleman who made the Jus. He had better take care what he does. lie er of the Court, and we shall know how to deal with nealy: The first part of the paragraph which relates halley, Mr. Onslow, and your lordships, 1 shall Dot La latter part states that at a certain meeting of the >r the prosecution It was decided that, should the gree upon their verdict, the Government will i fresh jury and prosecute the defendant upon one the indictment only-viz. that relating to Lady and the contents of the sealed packet. "It is ly asserted In Westminster Hall," continues the i, that the j ary have agreed, but have been re- 0 abstain from stopping the case by reason ol many 'srved." wkins: I can only say, on the part of the prbucu- t they are not aware of any such Qousultation. .) rd Chief Justice, having looked at the paragraph, as very wrong, but waa utterly contemptible and tlca Mellor: It Is supremely ridiculous. 'd Chief Justice: It is exceedingly 1E proper, but irth notice. ivkti,- it should be understood that there is no t so far as the prosecution is ccncernc d. reman: Nor so far as the j'try are concerned. wkins then proceeded with his address. He ana- evidence to show that Roger Tichborno had never lelipiUa, where the defendant had lived for a con- time, and formed many acquaintances, and con- st the defendant had evinced in his examination -examination as complete ignorance of Roger's life America as It was possible to connive. In reference barkation of Roger on board the Bella and the evi- Captain Oates cn the Eubject, Mr. Hawkins said not the slightest foundation for the gross imputa- cted against Mr. Crdohester Fjrtescue for having ne appointment to Captain Oates in connection with of Trade. rd Chief Justlcs said he had received a letter from "ester Forteicue statimr that when he gave emplcl Captaln Oates as an occasional assessor in nautical he did not even know that he was a witness in this wklrB said it was a scandalous Imputation, and Mr. sr Fortescue had no means of defending himself ch protection as he could get from their loriiahips es or the good common-sense ol the jury. He bad whatever to do with the case, yet It was wickedly lly suggested that he gave a place to a man in order him to remain In this country and give evidence rosecution. rd Chief Justice: Mr. Chichester Fortescue asked on and advice as to whether he should take any the imputation, but I thought his character stood to be affected by It. \Wk!ns I am glad to bear your lordihlp say that, tnoie unfounded imputation never was made. stlce Lush: It is only one of a great number of 100- 1 which have baen thrown broadcast. wkins Yes. Mr. Chllders has also been attacked. 10 one has escaped. I think I am justified In say- wlth your knowledge of the high honour of Mr. sr Fortescue, I can afford to treat the imputation )n him with the utmost contempt. application ol Mr. Hawkins, the court agreed to ,t three o'clock to enabie himself and other mem- the bar to be present at the "farewell" 01 Mr. Ittin in the Exchequer. remarking on some of the evidence in reference to the learned counsel continued From ths hour •'la's wreck you have nothing bit an Invented story ired tale of the life which terminated with that mity. With that tale I mmt next proceed to d first of all with the defendant's testimony the catastrophe itself. After commenting on tlptions given, all differing, Mr. Hawkins said ladant's account of his subsistence when In the 3 ludictou?. One boat had the provisions and 1a1 the maps and charts, and they kept up a kind of P'cnic, pulling up night and morning t) receive visions from the other boat. And in describing the picked him up he said she was a large three-mastel th yards on all three of her mast?, and although he ,e months aboard he did not ask where the ship om or the exact name of the captain. It was im- to suppose that If an Otprey picked up three ebip- men there was no entry made in her log. Can suppose that an Intelligent, educated passenger, picked up and saved, would not have been asked to particulars of hit shipwreck, and that after it would led and signed by him ? The defendant's story ilbout frreck and his being taved is so outrageously ab- t his own counsel bed to abandon it as recklessly td Incredible." "You must not ruicd his oath," sani aet "And I agree with him," said Mr. Hawkins, "ex- the purposed convicting him of perjury." He made its at random; no doubt they are hopelessly, rid ca- xurd. Bit they are not the less false, aad he is not ;ullty ot pel jary in making them. The crew divided boatswlth the provisions in one of them Was it ne- to expose the hopeless absurdity of the story ? The the delirium, the rescue, the anxiety. it was ie-up story. But take it as it stood. E'gfctmenbe- oself picked np at sea, In a vessel with a crew of only Jen, all of them aware of the wreck and the rescue ossible that for twenty years there should be no such an event, none of the crew or passengers cf issel ever heard of, no communication from any one Ight or nine men saved from the wreck, not even a mi one of the crew written after the wreck, not a any such letter, not a trace of the existence of any men for twenty years? Lice Lush: Some of the men had families. vkir.s: Yes, and there was never ar.y communi. tl any of them. Then there were the whole of the B Osprey, as well as those of the Bella-28 persons of wnom any trace had ever been Leard for 20 M such a story credible ? Eight or nine men picked 'pfn ocean afier a week, and after two days* ex- the sun, and one cf them deliriom-such a story ttalnly have been heard of, and would have sympathy. And yet never heard of for 20 i,*M a story utterly unsupported and uncon- ho ^Was not confirmed by a single statement ''e defendant himself prior to his setting up his bimself was silent about it until 18C5, when he '8, impudent claim. There was absolutely no con- his story even in any previous statement by him- Med entirely on the unsupported oath of the de- Vvl day in October last when Jean Luie, after ths' careful seclusion, was brought forward to tell ed tale, and thereby to render the story, if possible, a Incrediiila than it was before. if it could 'Upoosed that the defendant was not fully cog- wjle,gperjllre(j tai6) it would not have so seriously t his case. But, looking at, the circumstances at- P°n their meeting and mutual recognition, when lant pretended to know his name as Lule," he avoid coming to the conclusion that the defentl- P the least, kuew that the tale was perjured. What "e? He described himself as a Dane, ai d he said 852 he joined the Osprey, a vessel originally, he sish, and called the Helvetia. He said he was **el in i £ 53j and thai early in January, 1851, it lew York, and then loaded a cargo at Staten ere. And he gave such details and partlcllbrs- as the 7th cf July-that if tho story were trua must have been discoverable. He professed to lames of her owner, her brokers, her captain, and ore—the brokers being, he said, Funcko ar.d Co., in Bennett, and her stevedore Thompson and he It on to state that the vessel sailed ou her Melbourne, and about 400 miles off Rio c'mo loat in which only the heads of two men were that there were four more lying down inseu- among them the defendant. The cap rain, he k: their names. The defindant was iu his own he voyage lasted three months, and the ship t Melbourne early in July, 1854, about the end of Week. Daring that tnterva, he said, he had to defendant all over, and the defendant, he said, 3d of his crooked fluger. In washing him he said ,he "brown mark;" an inch long. He employed aid Luie, tu picking oakum (how couli Luie know about picking oakum ?) and in reading the Garden ul. "He never dined with the captain; he had in my cabin. He always called me Luie. Hit Ion was In French and Spanish. Ho was dc- Qlle on board. He said his nama was R.gers. believed he was a runaway bankrupt. He said the eaten through the timbers, and made the hak Wed the wreck." But from the account given t.y dant hImself it was manifest that the defendant e known that Luie or he must have been telling a 3 falsehood Nay, more, he must have known Perjured, for uh,:n he pretended to recoguizs Luie Q'-Ver have seen bim, lor in 1854 Luia was in Bui), the defendant never could have seen him. Luie 'nett was the captain; the defendant said it Ilb. or. Lewis Owen, or OWen Lewis. This chip t have loaded at Staten Island. The defendant lere were eight or nine p,asengers on board; d there were none. If it had been the other Luie had said there were passengers and the de- 1M said there were none, hit counsel might have was delirious, but he swore he had known and the passengers. Again, Lule swore he picked up at a distance from Rie which was utterly impos- p> by the entry at Lloyd's and the evidence, it ap- lat the fragments of wreck found were about 150 01 the shore How did the little boat, with ship- Bailors, exhausted by fatigue, go a distmce cf from that spot within two or three dajs The ory was entirely a fabrication. It was entirely 'Ce with the defendant's in many respect?. The swore that several of the men were rowing, he himself was baling out the water from the en It was picked up. Luie said he only saw the two men, who appeared to be paddling, and that fe four other men lying down, Inciuding the defend- oat^ had become of the other three men to 'e defendant had sworn? Ho had sworn there tten picked up. In that he could not have been and, therefore, he must have known that if his 8 «Ue that ol Luie was a lie. So as to not dining c.iptaiu; in that aho the story was In con is tent attendant's. A^aio, there was nothing in the de- story about picking ol oakum and the Garden of ^le said the name ol the captain was Baune t uant Said it was Lewis or Owen. Luie said the df- passed as Roger?; the delendant stid be was only i' f'oger Tichbcrne. Lule said the delendant was »o be a runaway bankrupt; tbe defendant swore on board a: a youag English gentleman, and iTirt k ^ae £ e discrepancies were destructive of both j showed that both were pure inventions lhen, *'<nding at Melbourne, the delendant swore he went '^9 that he and the defaniiant, with two ot the two of the Osprey men, went on shore 'b°at (whereas the defendant swore he was left Vl tt 'hat the names of the .two men of the Bella « Enl Lewis. The de'endant must have known o»« I?* the 1,st ot the craw w&s extant, [jej^era had proved that there were no such men fames'118*1" ^ehave the official list of the crew, and SEE- • such names. Moreover, the defendant 'hlch v "ier t° be written, which is in evidence, ed an,? l'ro'e;sed to give the names of the men who hem cames cl Jar vis1 and Lewis were not mt nV.in. 6 ietter mentioned Shears, Peebles, and i er Jarvit nor L3wis. JOUrt again adjourned.

[No title]

MORTALITY IN THE PEERAGE.I

[No title]

THE PROSECUTION OF JEAN LITlE.I

THE ADDRESSES OF MR. GLADSTONE…

THE MARRIAGE OF THE DUKE OF…

THE MARRIAGE FESTIVITIES.

[No title]

REPORTED DEATH OF DR. LIVINGSTONE.

[No title]

THE EMPEROR NAPOLEON'S CIVIL…

THE MARKETS.

[No title]